Commission expenditure to doctors by a pharmacy
whether hit by ethical code of conduct of Indian medical council and is a
disallowable expenditure
Facts:
Assessee a pharmacist paid commission to certain doctors
for promoting their business which was disallowed by AO and CIT(A) holding that
these were not permitted as per ethical guidelines of Indian Medical Council.
On appeal it was pleaded that the payments were for some advisory services on
stocking of pharma goods and the regulations of the IMC would not apply to the
assessee who was only a pharmacist or an allied entity in the medical field. It
was also impressed upon that the TDS was applied and the doctors would have
disclosed the said payments as income in their assessments and thus it was tax
neutral as well. On appeal -
Held against the assessee that the payment of commission
was not an allowable expenditure. The point of TDS deduction made/tax
neutrality of income being taxed in hands of recipient Doctors, IMC guidelines
being not applicable to the assessee/allied medical entities were not
acceptable to the ITAT. The earlier year favourable decision of the assessee
would not apply as Supreme court has clarified this subsequently in its verdict
of Apex Labs. Assessee did not establish as to what advisory/consultation was
provided by the Doctors either.
Applied:
CBDT Circular No. 5/2012 Dated 01-08-2012
Apex Laboratories (P.) Ltd. (2022) 135 taxmann.com 286
(SC) : 2022 TaxPub(DT) 1374 (SC)
Mead Johnson Nutrition (India) (P.) Ltd. (2023) 149 taxmann.com 298
(Mum-Trib.) : 2023 TaxPub(DT) 1630 (Mum-Trib),
Stemade Biotech (P.) Ltd. (2022) 138 taxmann.com 368
(Mum-Trib.) : 2022 TaxPub(DT) 3520 (Mum-Trib),
Confederation of Pharmaceutical Industry v. CBDT [Writ
Petition No. 10793 of 2012, dt. 26-12-2012] : 2013 TaxPub(DT) 1468 (HP-HC)
Ed. Note: Decision
pertains to assessment year 2013-14 and subsequent amendments and the Apex
court verdict has been given greater weightage on principles of law.
Case: Sunflower
Pharmacy v. ITO 2023 TaxPub(DT) 6131 (Ahd-Trib)